Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Desert Braemar, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 4, 1963No. Civ. 7121PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

The plaintiff, appellant herein, brought these consolidated actions to recover compensation for services rendered as a general contractor in connection with the construction of a 100-unit cooperative apartment project owned by the defendant, the respondent herein; one was upon a common count to recover the reasonable value of those services; and the other was to foreclose a general contractor’s lien for the same services.

The parties involved in this transaction were the plaintiff, a licensed general contractor; the defendant Desert Braemar, Inc., herein referred to as the Desert Company,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Castagnino v. BallettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Oliver v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Haggerty v. WarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Hale Bros. v. MillikenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rafael Chodos, an Individual v. West Publishing Company, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation Doing Business in California Dba Bancroft-Whitney CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. B. C. Richter Contracting Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Benson Elec. Co. v. Hale Bros. Assoc., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Bayol v. Zipcar, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. Johnston v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API