United States v. Lill
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
COPENHAVER, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss by virtue of a violation of Rule 6(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure in that two government agents appeared simultaneously and testified interchangeably as witnesses before the grand jury returning the second of two indictments in this case. This issue was reserved from prior rulings by the court.
The procedural history of defendants’ motion is as follows: The first of two indictments in this case was returned on June 14, - 1979. In his omnibus motion filed on July 6,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Maurice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- United States v. Virginia Erection Corporation and John P. ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Harvey Birdman, United States of America v. William RichmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- United States v. EdgertonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1897
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. MechanikSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commonwealth v. PezzanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- United States v. MechanikCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. John M. PoindexterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- United States v. PignatielloDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.