United States v. Mechanik
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(d) states that only-specified persons including “the witness under examination” may be present at a grand jury proceeding. In these cases, two Government witnesses testified in tandem before the grand jury, which indicted respondents and cross-petitioners (hereafter defendants) Mechanik and Lili for various drug-related offenses and conspiracy to commit such offenses. The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that the simultaneous presence of these two witnesses violated Rule 6(d), and that even though the petit jury subsequently returned a verdict…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by889 opinions
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- People v. CarinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
884 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.