United States v. Edgerton
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
BELLINGER, District Judge.
The questions for decision arise upon motions to quash four several indictments against the defendant, Erastus D. Edgerton, and upon pleas in abatement to said indictments. The motions and pleas are upon the same grounds, except that it is alleged as a ground of separate plea that said defendant was required by a subpoena to appear before the grand jury as a witness, and that he did appear in obedience to such subpoena, and was sworn and examined and required to testify to matters and things relating to and material to the charge made in the indictment against him,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. KilpatrickDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1883
- Lewis v. . Commissioners of WakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
- United States v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1871
3Cited by91 opinions
- United States v. Computer Sciences Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Hyman WinterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- State v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- Coblentz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- United States v. GoldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.