Legal Opinion
United States v. Mechanik
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 16, 1984No. Nos. 80-5166 to 80-5169PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge:
Steven H. Riddle, Shahbaz S. Zarintash, Jerome O. Lili, and Marshall Mechanik, convicted of drug related offenses, assign as principal error the district court’s denial of their motion to dismiss the indictment because the prosecutor violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(d).1 Mark D. Chadwick, charged with conspiracy, appeals the district court’s denial of a judgment of acquittal after the jury was unable to reach a verdict.
Because two witnesses testified simultaneously before the grand jury in violation of rule 6(d), we conclude that count 1, charging…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Computer Sciences Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. David Jack Vogt, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Raleigh Porter v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Peterson v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Curtis DrummondCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. John M. PoindexterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.