Legal Opinion
United States v. Pignatiello
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 28, 1984No. Crim. 83-CR-334PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
MATSCH, District Judge.
The defendants have moved to dismiss the indictment in this criminal proceeding because of asserted violations of Rule 6(d) and Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure during the course of the grand jury investigation which resulted in the indictment. This court heard evidence on the motion on March 8,1984; the motion has been briefed and oral argument was heard on March 23, 1984. There is no dispute on the relevant and material facts.
Lillian Filegar is a lawyer employed by the Securities and Exchange Commission…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Computer Sciences Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Harvey Birdman, United States of America v. William RichmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- United States v. GoldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Latham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1915
- United States v. Amos PinoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. William A. Kilpatrick, Declan J. O'donnell, Sheila C. Lerner, the Bank of Nova Scotia, Michael Alberga, C.S. Gill, and C.M. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. KilpatrickDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1984
- United States v. Stanley PlesinskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Dwire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- United States v. PignatielloDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.