Legal Opinion

United States v. Harvey Birdman, United States of America v. William Richman

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 25, 1979No. 78-1940, 78-1979 and 78-1980PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge.

These appeals concern three different varieties of allegedly unethical behavior by attorneys for the United States Government.

Appellant Harvey Birdman raises two questions relating to federal grand jury proceedings: (1) does a Government attorney’s alleged violation during such proceedings of the ABA Code of Professional Responsibility’s rules against an advocate’s testimony constitute an offense warranting dismissal of the resulting indictments; and (2) does the dual employment status of a United States Government agency staff attorney who is…

2Cases cited91 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Alton Coleman v. Betty Mitchell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, Donato F. Angiulo, Samuel S. Granito, Francesco J. Angiulo and Michele A. AngiuloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. HeldtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Leigh Raymond TamuraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. WootenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API