Legal Opinion
Dateline Builders, Inc. v. City of Santa Rosa
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 25, 1983No. Civ. 46704PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WHITE, P. J.
On this appeal by Dateline Builders, Inc. (Builders) from a judgment 1 in favor of the City of Santa Rosa (City), the major question is whether the City was required to connect its existing sewer trunk line to Builders’ proposed “leap frog” housing development beyond the City’s boundaries. For the reasons set forth below we have concluded 2 that the City reasonably exercised its police power because Builders’ proposed housing development was not consistent with the City’s compact land use and development policy as set forth in the City and County’s previously adopted…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCrackenSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Golden v. Planning Board of RamapoNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Griffin Development Co. v. City of OxnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Ehret v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Alameda County Land Use Assn. v. City of HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- County of Del Norte v. City of Crescent CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Kaiser Engineers, Inc. v. Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.