Legal Opinion
Griffin Development Co. v. City of Oxnard
California Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 1985No. L.A. 31930PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, J.
Appellant, developer and owner of an apartment complex in the City of Oxnard, appeals from a judgment upholding the city’s denial of a special use permit for the conversion of the apartments to condominium units. The primary issue is whether a city may—consistent with the requirements of due process—regulate the conversion of apartments to condominiums. If it may, did the city’s application of its condominium conversion ordinance result in a “taking” of appellant’s property?
We conclude that the ordinance before us is reasonably related to the accomplishment of a legitimate…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Schad v. Borough of Mount EphraimSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Terminal Plaza Corp. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- B & P DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. City of SaratogaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Hornstein v. BarryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.