Legal Opinion

Kaiser Engineers, Inc. v. Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1985No. A022465PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTT, J.

Kaiser Engineers, Inc. (Kaiser), appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend its cross-complaint against Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Company, Inc. (Grinnell). As we have concluded that Labor Code section 3864 1 does not require a third party beneficiary to be identified by name in an express indemnity agreement in order to enforce that agreement, we reverse the judgment.

I

Kaiser’s cross-complaint alleged the following facts. In 1978, Kaiser entered into a contract with the United States Department of Energy (DOE),…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Murphy v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Gilbert Financial Corp v. Steelform Contracting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Martinez v. Socoma Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Strang v. CabrolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Sessions Payroll Management, Inc. v. Noble Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Hatfield v. Halifax PLC & HBOS PLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Soderberg v. McKinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Balsam v. Tucows Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API