Legal Opinion
Alameda County Land Use Assn. v. City of Hayward
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 12, 1995No. A067490PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANING, J.
Plaintiffs and appellants Alameda County Land Use Association et al. 1 appeal the dismissal of their action for injunctive and declaratory relief after the demurrer of defendants and respondents City of Hayward et al. 2 was sustained without leave to amend. They contend the trial court erred in ruling their action was not ripe because they had not been injured by adoption of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) entered into between respondents concerning approximately 13,000 acres of open space.
Facts and Procedural History
When reviewing the sufficiency of a complaint against a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Gafcon, Inc. v. Ponsor & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Santa Margarita Area Residents Together v. San Luis Obispo County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Cotta v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- 108 HOLDINGS, LTD. v. City of Rohnert ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.