Legal Opinion

State ex rel. B.O.C. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1991No. 89-1958PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Per curiam

Two questions are directed at claimant’s layoff: (1) Is the issue res judicata or moot? and (2) If not, does layoff bar compensation for temporary total disability here? We answer both inquiries in the negative and for the following reasons affirm the appellate court’s judgment.

Prior to the period at issue, claimant received other compensation for temporary total disability related to the injury. Claimant asserts that because B.O.C. never raised the layoff issue then, it is barred by res judicata from doing so now. We disagree.

Res judicata operates “to preclude the relitigation of a point of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Rogers v. City of WhitehallOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State Ex Rel. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Zollner v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State ex rel. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. MorseOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Lycan v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State ex rel. Zollner v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Andersons v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API