Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1943No. 29557PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The question presented to the court is whether the facts disclosed by the record show a failure of the Industrial Commission to perform a duty specially enjoined by law and accordingly warranted the issuance of a writ of mandamus.

The Industrial Commission having rejected the claim of the relator upon the ground that his disability was not the result of the injury sustained, the question of the right of the relator to participate in the state insurance fund was submitted to and determined by the Court of Common Pleas upon appeal pursuant to the provisions of Section 1465-90, General Code.

Every…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Logsdon v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State Ex Rel. Stanek v. Industrial Commission of OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. State ex rel. Davey v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State ex rel. Waller v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API