Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. Foreman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1997No. 1995-0248PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 79 Ohio St.3d 78.] THE STATE EX REL. QUARTO MINING COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. FOREMAN ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. Foreman,

1997-Ohio-71.] Workers’ compensation—In evaluating claimant’s application for permanent total disability compensation, Industrial Commission does not abuse its discretion by failing to initiate the issue whether claimant’s retirement precludes his or her eligibility for permanent total disability compensation—Industrial Commission’s award of permanent total disability compensation…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State ex rel. Stephenson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Murphy v. Carrollton Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. ForemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Domjancic v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Huntington National Bank v. Burda, 08ap-658 (4-14-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Choate v. Tranet, Inc., Unpublished Decision (9-5-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Gardi v. Lakewood School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Bergman v. Monarch Constr. Co., Ca2008-02-044 (2-9-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API