Legal Opinion
Conold v. Stern
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 1941No. 28436PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This supplemental action was brought under Sections 9510-3 and 9510-4, General Code, to have the insurance money, provided for in a motor-vehicle-liability-insurance contract between the insurance company and the defendant, Karl Stern, applied in satisfaction of a judgment rendered in the Common Pleas Court of Summit county against defendant Stern, in an action by plaintiff for personal injuries.
In substance these sections provide (1) that in respect to every contract of insurance against third-party risks on account of bodily injury or death by accident, whenever a loss occurs on account of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Lorando v. GethroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Keith v. Willers Truck ServiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Luntz v. SternOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Meyerson v. New Idea Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
- O'MORROW v. BoradCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArghyrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.