Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 1989No. 17346PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal under the post-conviction procedure act, I.C. § 19-4901 et seq. In his application, Lavern Davis alleged that he had been deprived of effective assistance of counsel at his trial for possession of controlled substances and drug paraphernalia. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court concluded Davis was not entitled to any relief and denied the application. We affirm.

The following background is pertinent to this appeal. In January, 1984, Davis’ ex-wife, Judy, informed the Wendell Police Department that Davis had marijuana at his home. Based upon…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  5. United States v. George LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Murray v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Goodwin v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Russell v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Hassett v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Scruggs v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API