Legal Opinion

Murray v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1992No. 19371PublishedCited by 210 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying relief in a post-conviction proceeding brought under I.C. § 19-4901. The petitioner, Leon Murray, challenged the two, ten-year indeterminate and concurrent sentences he had received for aggravated assault on police officers, claiming coercion in accepting a plea bargain and asserting that he had been denied effective assistance of counsel because his court-appointed attorney had failed to request concurrent sentences of five years determinate. He also alleged that he was denied effective assistance of counsel with regard to a motion…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. BearshieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Russell v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Stuart v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Pope v. Intermountain Gas Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by210 opinions

  1. Roman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Goodwin v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Hassett v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Knutsen v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Self v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007

205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API