Russell v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
This is a review of an order denying an application for relief under the Post-Conviction Procedure Act, I.C. § 19-4901 to -4911. In his application, Harold Russell alleged that he was denied effective assistance of counsel, causing him to enter an involuntary plea of guilty and to receive an excessive sentence for the crimes.of first degree burglary and grand theft. Russell also submitted that the district judge failed to inform him of his Sixth Amendment rights before he entered his plea. After conducting an evidentiary hearing, the district judge concluded that Russell…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. BearshieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. CarrascoIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Davis v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- Murray v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
- Goodwin v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
- Hassett v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
- Knutsen v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- Self v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.