Legal Opinion

Aragon v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1988No. 16742PublishedCited by 319 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

Appellant Mark Aragon was convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to death. On appeal he argues that the district court erred in denying his post-conviction petition in that he was denied effective assistance of counsel, and also because he was denied the constitutional right to testify. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND.

Aragon was convicted by a jury of murder in the first degree in the death of eight month old Monique Longoria. The trial judge sentenced him to death and the Su preme Court affirmed the conviction and sentence. State v. Aragon, 107 Idaho…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by319 opinions

  1. State v. BeyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Roman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Dunlap v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. GulbrandsonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Goodwin v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002

314 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API