Hasselman v. Douglass
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, C. J.
By this action the appellees, Samuel M. Douglass and James G. Douglass, sought a foreclosure of a mortgage given by appellants, L. W. Hasselman and W. P. Fish back, to secure the payment of certain notes specified in the mortgage, and the performance by Hasselman of an agreement made by him with the appellees and Mr. A. H. Conner.
The appellants answered in seven paragraphs. A general denial was replied to the first, second and fifth paragraphs of the answer, and demurrers were sustained to the third, fourth,, sixth and seventh. The cause proceeded to final judgment at special term in the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Briggs v. DaughertyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Smith v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Van Scoter v. LeffertsNew York Supreme Court · 1851
- Eakin v. FentonIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Abey v. BennettIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thompson v. LoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Riddell v. RamseyMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- Crossley v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Over v. HetheringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Gandía v. TríasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.