Legal Opinion

Warring v. Hill

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 8946PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The first paragraph of the appellee’s complaint alleges that the parties to this action were partners; that as such they executed their promissory note to one John Lucas; that the money derived from the note went into the business of the partnership; that afterwards the partnership was dissolved by mutual agreement, and that, in the language of the complaint, “ they, as such partners, had a full settlement of all partnership business between themselves, including said note given to said Lucas, at which time the plaintiff paid to the defendant his full share of said partnership indebtedness…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wells v. CarpenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Snyder v. BaberIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Crossley v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Lawrence v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1840
  5. Meredith v. EwingIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lincoln Operating Co. v. GillisIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Taggart v. TevannyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Thompson v. LoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Pressley v. HarrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API