Legal Opinion

Dare County v. Mater

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 27, 1952No. 28PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBakNhill, J.

We need not now consider plaintiff’s motion to strike defendant’s purported case on appeal for tbe reason a fatal defect appears on tbe face of tbe record. Lawrence v. Lawrence, 226 N.C. 221, 37 S.E. 2d 496; Bell v. Nivens, 225 N.C. 35, 33 S.E. 2d 66; S. v. Parnell, 214 N.C. 467, 199 S.E. 601. In fact, it may be that tbe service of a case on appeal was not required. Privette v. Allen, 227 N.C. 164, 41 S.E. 2d 364.

If tbe plaintiff is seeking to abate a public nuisance — and tbe complaint may be so construed — it is without authority to maintain this action.

An action to abate a public nuisance…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. . BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Lawrence v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Patterson v. . HubbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  4. Clinton v. . RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Bell v. . NivensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. D & W, INC. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Mills v. CAROLINA CEMETERY PARK CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Town of Fuquay Springs v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Mahan v. ReadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Warren County v. North CarolinaDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API