Skinner v. Empresa Transformadora De Productos Agropecuarios
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.
At the threshold of this case we are confronted with the question of law whether, in his complaint, the plaintiff, W. I. Skinner, has alleged a cause of action against Transformadora. It is fundamental that the real party in interest must prosecute the action. G.S. 1-57; Sanitary District v. Lenoir, 249 N.C. 96, 105 S.E. 2d 411; Cotton Mills v. Duplan Corp., 246 N.C. 88, 97 S.E. 2d 449; Watson v. Lee County, 224 N.C. 508, 31 S.E. 2d 535; Snipes v. Monds, 190 N.C. 190, 129 S.E. 413; Elam v. Barnes, 110 N.C. 73, 14 S.E. 621. W. I. Skinner alleges the negotiations leading to the contract were…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. East Lenoir Sanitary District v. City of LenoirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Maola Ice Cream Co. v. Maola Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Hopkins v. . BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Henderson County v. . SmythSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Aiken v. SanderfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Underwood v. StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Redevelopment Commission of Greensboro v. HaginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Gillikin v. SpringleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Parrish v. BrantleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.