Legal Opinion

State v. Berardinelli

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 22, 1989No. C86-11-36000 C86-11-35999 CA A45189 (Control) CA A46707PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARDEN, P. J. pro tempore.

Defendants in this consolidated appeal seek reversal of their convictions for possession of marijuana and methamphetamine and delivery of methamphetamine. They assign as error the trial court’s denial of their motions to suppress evidence taken in a search of their residence. They argue that the affidavit in support of the search warrant was insufficient and that the execution of the warrant violated applicable statutory standards. We affirm.

In November, 1986, officers of the Portland Police Narcotics Division and the Special Emergency Reaction Team (SERT) searched a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. ValentineOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. BrockOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. BishopOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. ArceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. StalbertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. BostCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. BostCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API