Legal Opinion
State v. Valentine
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 14, 1972PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.
The issue is whether evidence should have been, suppressed because it was allegedly obtained by officers entering premises without first knocking and. announcing their presence and purpose.
-. The • trial court denied defendants’- motion - to suppress the introduction of narcotics seized by the authorities. The defendants were convicted of the possession of narcotics. The Court of Appeals, affirmed. State v. Darroch, 8 Or App 32, 492 P2d 308 (1971). We granted the petition for review. ■ . - - - -,
-. - A- f ederal undercover' 'agent -purchased ,a small quantity "of hashish from' the defendant '…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. AttawayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. RodriguezOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. FloranceOregon Supreme Court · 1974
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.