Legal Opinion

State v. Bishop

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1980No. C77-08-12166, CA 10219, SC 26032PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Defendant was convicted of burglary in the first degree. The conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, 37 Or App 909, 587 P2d 1057 (1978). This court allowed review.

Four police officers went to the house of defendant’s mother for the purpose of arresting defendant. They went there because it was his mother’s home and an automobile thought to be defendant’s was parked in front. Defendant was living with his mother but this was unknown to the police at the time. The police had knowledge that a warrant had issued for defendant’s arrest and they claimed to have probable cause to arrest him…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State v. ValentineOregon Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. BrockOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. ArceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API