Legal Opinion

State v. Brock

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1982No. CA 17453, SC 28135PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

Defendant appeals a conviction of theft of a washer, a dryer, a roll of carpet and a full-length mirror. Those items were seized in his home at night pursuant to a search warrant which was indorsed for daytime or nighttime execution. The trial court denied his motion to suppress the evidence. The Court of Appeals affirmed in banc by a fragmented court. We allowed review to consider the application of ORS 133.565(3) which restricts execution of search warrants to daytime hours unless the warrant is otherwise indorsed.

The affidavit in support of the search warrant contained ample allegations to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Gooding v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. State v. ValentineOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. BishopOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Linnen v. BanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. TrenaryOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. DylaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. State v. WestlundOregon Supreme Court · 1986

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API