Legal Opinion

State v. Arce

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 31, 1986No. 153,170, CA A35400PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*187WARDEN, P. J.

The state appeals from a pretrial order suppressing evidence seized in the execution of a search warrant. We affirm.

In October, 1984, officers of the Marion County Sheriffs Office and the City of Woodburn Police Department searched a residence in Gervais, pursuant to a search warrant issued by the district court. Heroin and cocaine were seized, and defendant was arrested and charged with possession of both controlled substances.1

The principal basis for the search warrant was a “controlled buy” of cocaine by a police informant. The informant told officers that, when he was inside…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. BishopOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. TweedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. State v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. State v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. State v. BerardinelliCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API