State v. Stalbert
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*584DEITS, J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for delivery and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1); ORS 475.992(4). He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motions to suppress and for judgment of acquittal. We affirm.
In April, 1986, Portland police officers searched a house in north Portland pursuant to a search warrant. Before executing the warrant, they watched the house for one and one-half hours. The house had previously been under surveillance, and they were aware that the usual method of doing business at this house was that two men would arrive at the house…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. ValentineOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. TweedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- State v. BerardinelliCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. StevensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. SerbinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.