Legal Opinion

Regoli v. Stevenson

California Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1918No. L. A. No. 4589PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

VICTOR E. SHAW, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff sued defendant for the breach of a written contract whereby it is alleged the latter, for a specified sum per foot, agreed to bore a well on plaintiff’s land in section 22, to a depth of 250 feet. Defendant denied the allegations of the complaint essential to plaintiff’s recovery, and, by a separate pleading, alleged the making of an. oral contract with plaintiff to bore a well on land other than that owned by plaintiff in section 22, for which plaintiff agreed to pay him the reasonable value of his services, alleged to he $350, and upon which defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adams v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Citizens' Bank of Los Angeles v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Litvinuk v. LitvinukCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. W. P. Fuller & Co. v. McClureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Marsh v. LappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Kerr v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Haime v. De BeaulieuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API