Marsh v. Lapp
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a "judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Pat R. Parker, Judge Presiding. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
[1] The defendaiit appeals from a judg~ ment in plaintiff’s favor, and attempts to appeal from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The appeal from such order, being no longer allowed by statute, must be dismissed. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 963, amended 1915, [Stats. 1915, p. 209]; Eegoli v. Stevenson, 179 Cal. 257, [176 Pac. 158].)
[2] The appeal is under the alternative method. Since defendant does not print in his briefs, in accordance with the statutory provisions, such portions of the record as he wishes to rely upon, his appeal deserves no consideration. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 953c;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bray v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Foster v. GoreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
- Schneider v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Regoli v. StevensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Lexington Bank v. WirgesNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re JinglesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- In Re BrambleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- In Re LeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- In Re WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Strauch v. BielohCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.