Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Nelson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1936No. L. A. 14153PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Plaintiff Kerr entered into two written contracts, one with defendant Nelson, pursuant to which defendant corporation was organized; the other with the defendant corporation. Under these contracts, plaintiff agreed to devote his time and attention exclusively to the business of the corporation for a period of three years, and to use his best efforts to promote the development, extension and upbuilding thereof. In return he was to receive the weekly sum of one hundred dollars, .and defendant Nelson was to issue in plaintiff’s name four thousand shares of the capital stock of the corporation,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alderson v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Universal Pictures Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Crow v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Regoli v. StevensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Cook v. GardnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Robinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Levy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. People v. NormanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Wright v. Round the Corner Restaurants of La., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API