Legal Opinion

Haime v. De Beaulieu

California Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1942No. L. A. 17935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment quieting title in defendants de Beaulieu, husband and wife, to residence property situated in San Marina, California.

In August, 1939, plaintiff owned the property in question. It was encumbered by a trust deed given to secure a note held by the Mortgage Guarantee Company as payee and beneficiary. Furniture owned by plaintiff was encumbered bj^ a chattel mortgage held by the Carlton Finance Company. Plaintiff being unable to pay the note secured by the trust deed, a trustee’s sale was had in that month at which the beneficiary was the purchaser. About…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. BostwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Gray v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Regoli v. StevensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Hughes v. KorntvedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Lane & Pyron, Inc. v. GibbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. City of National City v. DunlopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Smith v. McKinstryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API