Legal Opinion
Meadows v. Higgins
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 1, 1999No. SC 15997PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*157 Opinion
KATZ, J.
The defendants Harrison Scott Higgins and Linda Plank Higgins (defendants)1 appealed to the Appellate Court from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Michael Meadows, doing business as Paper Pro, ordering strict foreclosure of his mechanic’s lien. The defendants claimed that the trial court had improperly: (1) determined that the Home Improvement Act (act),2 did not apply to the transaction between the plaintiff and the defendants; and (2) awarded attorney’s fees to the plaintiff pursuant to General Statutes § 52-249, which provides for such fees…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Liljedahl Bros. v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Barrett Builders v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Hees v. Burke Construction Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- John M. Glover Agency v. RDB Building, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Original Grasso Construction Co. v. ShepherdConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Girolametti v. Michael Horton Assocs., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- MD Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. AbramsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.