Legal Opinion

Murphy v. International Robotic Systems, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 17, 2000No. SC92837PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

766 So.2d 1010 (2000)

Robert MURPHY and Technology Innovations International, Inc., Petitioners,

v.

INTERNATIONAL ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, INC., and Howard Hornsby, Respondents.

No. SC92837.

Supreme Court of Florida.

August 17, 2000.

R. Stuart Huff and Mark L. Mallios, Coral Gables, Florida, for Petitioners.

David A. Jaynes, West Palm Beach, Florida, for Respondents.

LEWIS, J.

We have for review Murphy v. International Robotics Systems, Inc., 710 So.2d 587 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), which expressly and directly conflicts with decisions from the First and Third District Courts of Appeal[1] regarding when relief may…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Pariente; Concurrence · Anstead.

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. PfeiferSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Castor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. Liggett Group, Inc. v. EngleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Estate of Despain v. Avante Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  4. Rodolfo Valladares v. Bank of America Corporation, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2016
  5. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. TownsendDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API