Legal Opinion
G. HEILEMAN BREWING COMPANY, INC., Petitioner—Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent—Cross-Petitioner
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 19, 1989No. 88-2905 & 88-3069PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge. .
The petitioner — cross-respondent, G. Heileman Brewing Company, Inc. (“Heile-man”), seeks review of a National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) order finding Heileman in violation of § 8(a)(1) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). Conversely, the respondent — cross-petitioner, the NLRB, seeks enforcement of its order. In its decision, the NLRB determined that Heileman wrongfully refused to bargain with Local Union 309 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (“Local 309”) over its decision to terminate the services of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Boire v. Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- William Bridge v. New Holland Logansport, IncorpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Joyce Whitaker v. Milwaukee County, WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Matthew Faush v. Tuesday MorningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Graves v. LoweryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Chicago Tribune Company v. National Labor Relations Board, and Chicago Typographical Union No. 16, Communications Workers of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.