Legal Opinion

Cragin v. Gardner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1887PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Case made from Oceana. (Russell, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

This is a case made after judgment settled and signed by the circuit judge. The case contains all the evidence in the cause, and also a finding of facts by the circuit judge. The suit was commenced in justice’s court in the name of William P. Cragin, Edward E. Cragin, and Charles *401L. Dudley, copartners composing the firm of Cragin Brothers & Co. Issue was joined in that court, and, upon trial, the defendant had judgment for 811 and costs, under a notice of set-off. Pi aintiffs appealed to the circuit, where, by stipulation of the parties,, the testimony of Edward E. Cragin was taken in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kimball & Austin Manufacturing Co. v. VromanMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Heimbach v. WeinbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. SilverthornMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Nelson v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Crusoe Bros. v. KudnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. First National Bank of Paw Paw v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Holcomb v. SayersMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API