Legal Opinion

Crusoe Bros. v. Kudner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1904No. Docket No. 110PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Oakland; Smith, J. Garnishment proceedings by the Crusoe Brothers Company against Henry C. Kudner, as garnishee of John H. Smith. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoobe, C. J.

This case was heard by the circuit judge, who, at the request of the parties, made findings of fact and of law, in substance as follows:

“ Plaintiffs are wholesale dealers in groceries at Detroit. In' 1902 the principal defendant, John H. Smith, had a small grocery store and meat market in Pontiac. Plaintiffs sold Smith goods prior to September 8, 1902, to the amount of $73.97, and between September 8, 1902, and October 2, 1902, further goods to the amount of $115.48, and have not been paid for any of them. Plaintiffs ceased making sales to defendant October 2, 1902, because of the filing of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heineman v. SchlossMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Goll & Frank Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  3. Lamoreaux v. CrevelingMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Falker v. LinehanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  5. Cragin v. GardnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moore v. Royal Oak Lumber & Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Jelos v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Berger Furnace Co. v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Fremont State Bank v. Old State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Rice v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API