Legal Opinion
Holcomb v. Sayers
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1912No. Docket No. 67PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error to Superior Court of Grand Rapids; Stuart, J. Assumpsit by Martin H. Holcomb against Frank P. Sayers and another for the amount of a check. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
This case was tried before the judge of the superior court of the city of Grand Rapids, who made the following findings of fact and of law:
“ (1) That on May 11, 1910, the defendant Edwin F. Sayers, of Grand .Rapids, went to the residence of one John B. Bagley, who lived about two miles from the village of Pierson, in Montcalm county, for the purpose of buying a horse.
*239“ (2) That on being shown the horse said Sayers was pleased with its appearance, and, after driving it about a little to try its wind, he stated to Mr. Bagley, in substance, that, if the horse was all right in every way, he would…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lamoreaux v. CrevelingMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Cragin v. GardnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Hindman v. FriedrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by5 opinions
- Valentine v. MaloneMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Nelson v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Funk v. TessinMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- McNall v. Mitchell's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. HibblerMichigan Supreme Court · 1913