Legal Opinion

Kimball & Austin Manufacturing Co. v. Vroman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1877PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Eitoi* to Kalamazoo Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, J.:

Yroman and his deceased co-plaintiff below sued plaintiff in error to recover for a cause of action arising out of an alleged breach of warranty of a steam engine, purchased of the latter, and found so defective as, according to the claim, to be practically useless.

Judgment was recovered below for an amount which seems to be the original purchase money with interest, and error is brought for various causes, including an amendment in the name of the plaintiff in error, and certain rulings on the questions of warranty and damages, as well as on evidence, and on the form of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Final v. BackusMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Sherman v. Proprietors of Connecticut River BridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Morford v. DieffenbackerMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. v. Gish, Brook & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Barber v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Phelps v. WhitakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Gans v. BeasleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API