Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Stewart

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1913No. Docket No. 89PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Sullivan, J. Assumpsit by Adolph Nelson against Eugene Stewart and John L. Bolen for money had and received. Judgment for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

This case was tried by the court without a jury. After hearing the testimony offered, and amendments to the proposed findings of facts and oonclusions of law having been submitted to the court, the circuit judge made the following findings, which give a history of the transactions which resulted in this litigation:

“ (1) That prior to January 25,1908, the estate of John Nelson was pending in the probate court of the county of Cook and State of Illinois, and that the plaintiff claimed to be the son and sole heir at law of said John Nelson, deceased, and was so described in the petition for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lamoreaux v. CrevelingMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Cragin v. GardnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Holcomb v. SayersMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Darling Milling Co. v. ChapmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Hindman v. FriedrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. HW Nelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. Bradley Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
  3. Tuuk v. AndersenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Herrmann v. GleasonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  5. Grand Trunk Western R. v. H. W. Nelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API