Tehama County v. Bryan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
— This is an action to condemn a strip of land, the property of defendant, for the use of the public-as a highway. Certain issues were submitted to a jury, and the remaining issues were tried by the court without a jury. Upon the verdict of the jury and findings of the *59court, judgment of condemnation was entered. The appeal is from the judgment, and from' an order denying a new trial. A demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint as amended was interposed, upon the ground that said complaint as amended, “does not .state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.” The demurrer was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cal. Southern R. R. v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Coburn v. AmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Hull v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Himmelmann v. SpanagelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by25 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- City of Santa Ana v. HarlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Monterey County v. CushingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Humboldt Cty. v. DinsmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Mullally v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.