Legal Opinion

Buob v. Feenaughty MacHinery Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1939No. 27279. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

In the complaint in this case, there are three causes of action, separately stated, and each states a cause of action for damages. The defendant denied all liability and cross-complained for the unpaid portion of the purchase price of a tractor which had been sold by the defendant to the plaintiff, and which resulted in the litigation. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff, who, not being satisfied with the amount of damages which he had been awarded, appealed. Buob v. Feenaughty Machinery Co., 191 Wash. 477, 71 P. (2d) 559. The opinion…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Dunn v. PleseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Colvin v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Western Dry Goods Co. v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Buob v. Feenaughty MacHinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Boe v. Hodgson Graham Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Buob v. Feenaughty MacHinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State Ex Rel. Tollefson v. NovakWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Cole v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Tobacco v. RubatinoWashington Supreme Court · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API