Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Tollefson v. Novak

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1941No. 28201PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This action was instituted by the prosecuting attorney of Pierce county to recover upon a bond which had been given pursuant to a judgment obtained in a prior abatement proceeding based upon a violation of the Washington state liquor act. Defendants demurred to the complaint, and, upon the overruling of the demurrer, elected to stand thereon. Judgment was entered for plaintiff, in the full amount of the bond, and defendants appealed.

In their opening argument, appellants call attention to the fact that no findings of fact or conclusions of law were made or entered by the trial court. Although…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Duke v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. State v. KnudsenWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Western Dry Goods Co. v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Davis v. VirgesWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. County of Snohomish v. RuffWashington Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estate of Jordan v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Maryland Medical Service, Inc. v. CarverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. State ex rel. Washington Water Power Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Paulsell v. PetersWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Cole v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API