Legal Opinion

Cole v. Osborne

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1944No. 29362PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

The complaint in this action, which was filed February 18,1943, stated an assigned cause of action against defendants, based upon medical and hospital services rendered by plaintiff’s assignor to defendant Herbert Osborne, Sr. An amended complaint was filed February 2, 1944, by which the amount claimed was somewhat reduced, though the cause of action was not materially changed.

Defendants answered the amended complaint, denying the material allegations thereof, and particularly that they were indebted to plaintiff or his assignor in any sum whatsoever. By way of an affirmative defense,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Dunn v. PleseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Colvin v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Western Dry Goods Co. v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State Ex Rel. Tollefson v. NovakWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Kietz v. Gold Point Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Tobacco v. RubatinoWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Cole v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API