Legal Opinion

Colvin v. Clark

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1915No. 12038PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurston county, Mitchell, J., entered September 15, 1913, in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

On the 25th day of April, 1912, plaintiffs and defendant entered into a written contract for the sale of the merchantable fir timber on certain lands belonging to the plaintiffs, in consideration of the payment of two dollars per thousand feet. The material parts of the contract follow:

“It is agreed that the amount of timber upon the said land is 10,825,000 feet; said timber shall be paid for by the party of the second part as the same shall be cut and logged, the mill scale shall be taken for the purpose of determining approximately the amount of timber logged each month, but the amount of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bard v. KleebWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Kilroy v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Wilson v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Knowles v. RogersWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State Ex Rel. Dunn v. PleseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. State v. KnudsenWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Western Dry Goods Co. v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. City of Seattle v. SilvermanWashington Supreme Court · 1950

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API