Ex Parte Henry Turner, On Habeas Corpus
California Supreme Court
Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
—The complaint upon which the petitioner was arrested, tried, and convicted charged that “said Henry Turner committed the crime of petit larceny, a misdemeanor, as follows, to wit; The said Henry Turner, on or about the thirteenth day of February, 1888, at the city of Stockton, county of San Joaquin, and state of California, did willfully, unlawfully, and felo*227niously steal, take, and carry away certain faucets, tube-scrapers, thumb and screw wrenches, and old pipe and pipe-connections, of the value of four dollars, gold coin of the United States of America, the same being then and there the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re RingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Ex parte Ah ChaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Hoffman v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Ex parte StephenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- In Re HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- In Re TurckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- In re ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941