Legal Opinion

Ex parte Ah Cha

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1870No. 2,278PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wallace, J.,

delivered tbe following opinion: [at- Chambers.]

These Chinamen bave been brought before me upon a writ of habeas corpus, to wbicb writ tbe Warden of tbe State Prison makes return tbat be detains them in custody by virtue of a judgment of tbe County Court of San Ber-nardino County, a copy of wbicb is annexed to tbe return, and by wbicb it appears tbat tbe prisoners, having been indicted of tbe crime of “an assault to commit murder,” were found guilty by tbe jury of “an assault to commit great bodily injury” only. Upon tbe verdict they were adjudged by tbe Court to be “punished by a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. VanardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  2. People v. EnglishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. ScherbingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Ex parte MaxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Territory v. ConradSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1877
  4. Ex parte TaniNevada Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API