Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Butler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1886No. 12,088PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Perry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Elliott, J. —

The appellant, Weridell Hoffman, and Thomas A. Clark, were sureties on a bond executed by Aaron Black-ford to the Remington Sewing Machine Company; the principal in the bond violated its condition and his sureties became liable to the obligee. The debt due the latter was compromised and a note was executed for the sum agreed to be paid; this note was signed by Clark and Hoffman, and was endorsed by John Marto and the appellee, James M. Butler. Suit was brought on the note and judgment.obtained. One-half of the amount of the debt evidenced by the notfe was paid by Butler and…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. . BlanchardNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Knopf v. MorelIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Moorman v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Ex Parte Henry Turner, On Habeas CorpusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Richards v. DyeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API