Hoffman v. Butler
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Perry Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Elliott, J. —
The appellant, Weridell Hoffman, and Thomas A. Clark, were sureties on a bond executed by Aaron Black-ford to the Remington Sewing Machine Company; the principal in the bond violated its condition and his sureties became liable to the obligee. The debt due the latter was compromised and a note was executed for the sum agreed to be paid; this note was signed by Clark and Hoffman, and was endorsed by John Marto and the appellee, James M. Butler. Suit was brought on the note and judgment.obtained. One-half of the amount of the debt evidenced by the notfe was paid by Butler and…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Blanchard v. . BlanchardNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Knopf v. MorelIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Moorman v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Ex Parte Henry Turner, On Habeas CorpusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Richards v. DyeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953