Legal Opinion

In Re Hayward

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 1923No. Crim. No. 1127PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Sure, J.

Petitioner Katharyn Hayward, was convicted in the justice’s court of the city of Berkeley upon a complaint alleging in part and charging as follows:

“That heretofore, to wit, on the 14th day of June, 1921, the City Council of the City of Berkeley, in pursuance of the power and authority in it vested by the Constitution of the State of California, and in it vested by law, duly passed and adopted a certain ordinance, entitled ‘Ordinance No. 724r-N. S., Prohibiting the Sale, Manufacture, unlawful possession or Transportation of Intoxicating Liquors, and Providing Penalties for Violation Hereof. ’
“…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Ex parte KearnyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Ex parte McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Matter of RuefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Ex parte MirandeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. State Ex Rel. Smith v. LeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  3. State Ex Rel. Neville v. OverbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. In Re StambaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. In Re SimmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API